NEWWorld's first AI visibility audit tool for Web3 is live.Run free audit →
RANKING Crypto Wallet·Last reviewed May 4, 2026

Best Crypto Wallet in 2026: Top 7 Software Wallets Ranked

Software wallet competition got serious in 2026. Phantom expanded into EVM and Bitcoin while MetaMask played catch-up on non-EVM chains. Rabby quietly became the security-first choice for DeFi power users. We ranked the 7 wallets that actually matter for self-custody right now, focused on real product velocity not legacy reputation.

TL;DR picks by use case

Best overall (multi-chain UX)
Phantom
Solana-native plus EVM, Bitcoin, Sui support with Phantom Cash debit card and CFTC no-action letter
Best for Ethereum and EVM DeFi
MetaMask
Largest dApp support footprint with 30M+ MAU and Snaps extensions ecosystem
Best security-first wallet
Rabby
Pre-transaction simulation, automatic chain switching, 0% swap fee, open-source
Best for mass market multi-chain
Trust Wallet
220M+ downloads with 100+ blockchain support and $0 staking fees
Best for crypto beginners
Coinbase Wallet
Smart Wallet with FIDO2 passkeys, account abstraction, no seed phrase needed
Best for Ethereum-native UX
Rainbow
ENS-first design with built-in NFT gallery and clean mobile experience

Methodology and scoring

We scored each crypto wallet across 7 weighted criteria reflecting what actually matters for self-custody in 2026. Multi-chain support (20%) measures both breadth of chains and depth of feature parity per chain. Security architecture (20%) covers transaction simulation, phishing detection, hardware wallet integration plus incident track record. dApp ecosystem support (15%) measures real connectivity to Web3 protocols not just claimed compatibility. Product velocity (15%) tracks 2026 shipping pace including new chains, features, regulatory clearance and acquisitions. UX quality (15%) evaluates mobile and desktop experience including chain-switching friction. Fee transparency (10%) covers swap fees, staking fees, hidden routing margins. User base trust (5%) reflects retention, audit history, breach record. Active wallets shipping new features in early 2026 score higher than legacy products coasting on brand equity.

Criterion Weight What we measure
Multi-chain support 20% Both breadth of chains and depth of feature parity per chain
Security architecture 20% Transaction simulation, phishing detection, hardware integration, incident track record
dApp ecosystem support 15% Real connectivity to Web3 protocols not just claimed compatibility
Product velocity 15% 2026 shipping pace including new chains, features, regulatory clearance, acquisitions
UX quality 15% Mobile and desktop experience including chain-switching friction
Fee transparency 10% Swap fees, staking fees, hidden routing margins disclosure
User base trust 5% Retention, audit history, breach record

The full ranking

Detailed evaluation for each protocol. Top scores get gold, silver and bronze badges. Scoring details in the methodology section above.

#1

Phantom

Most innovative multi-chain wallet with Solana dominance plus EVM and Bitcoin parity
Score
9.0/10

Phantom won 2026 by treating multi-chain as a product priority not a checkbox. It started as a Solana wallet then expanded to Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Bitcoin and Sui without compromising the original Solana experience. The February 2026 Phantom MCP Server release lets AI agents interact with embedded wallets via natural language, the first major wallet to ship MCP integration. The March 2026 CFTC no-action letter cleared regulatory uncertainty around non-custodial swap routing in the US. Phantom Cash debit card converts wallet balances to spendable USD without an off-ramp. Phantom acquired Blowfish to bring institutional-grade transaction security to consumer wallets. The result is a wallet that ships faster than any competitor while maintaining the cleanest UX in the category. The 0.85% swap fee is competitive with MetaMask 0.875% but undercuts Coinbase Wallet 1%. Where Phantom still trails: full EVM L2 coverage missing Arbitrum and Optimism native support, Ethereum DeFi feature depth less than MetaMask or Rabby for power users.

Key strengths

  • Multi-chain done right: Solana plus Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Bitcoin, Sui in unified UX
  • First major wallet with MCP server integration for AI agent transactions (February 2026)
  • CFTC no-action letter cleared regulatory uncertainty around US non-custodial swap routing
  • Phantom Cash debit card converts wallet balance to spendable USD without off-ramp friction
  • Acquired Blowfish in 2025 to bring institutional transaction security to consumer wallet
Honest weakness
Limited EVM L2 native support (no Arbitrum or Optimism) means power DeFi users still split between Phantom and MetaMask or Rabby
Who it's for
Multi-chain users wanting one wallet for Solana plus Ethereum without compromise. Solana DeFi traders. Users wanting the cleanest UX in 2026. Anyone testing AI agent integration via MCP.

Key metrics

Supported chains Solana, Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Bitcoin, Sui
Swap fee 0.85%
Mobile + extension Yes
Open source Partial (extension yes, mobile beta)
Hardware wallet support Ledger
Built-in staking SOL native, ETH via partners
Notable 2026 launches MCP Server, Phantom Chat, CFTC no-action letter
Compare Phantom
Phantom vs Solflare →MetaMask vs Phantom →Backpack vs Phantom →
#2

MetaMask

EVM gold standard with broadest dApp footprint and Snaps extension ecosystem
Score
8.6/10

MetaMask is still the wallet most dApps default to. Roughly 30 million monthly active users plus the deepest dApp connection footprint in Web3 mean some protocols literally only test against MetaMask first. The 2025 expansion to native Bitcoin, Solana and TRON closed the multi-chain gap that competitors had been exploiting for years. Snaps extensions create an extensibility layer no other wallet matches, with third-party developers adding non-EVM chain support and custom transaction flows. The 0.875% swap fee is industry-average. Where MetaMask now feels dated: manual chain switching still required for some workflows when Rabby ships auto-detection, transaction simulation less detailed than Rabby pre-execution checks, mobile UX feels heavier than Phantom or Rainbow. The Snaps ecosystem solves these problems if you install the right extensions but most users never get past the default experience.

Key strengths

  • 30M+ monthly active users plus deepest Web3 dApp connection footprint in the category
  • Snaps extension ecosystem creates extensibility layer no other wallet matches
  • 2025 added native Bitcoin, Solana, TRON support closing the multi-chain gap
  • Hardware wallet integration with 10+ devices including Ledger, Trezor, Keystone, NGRAVE
  • Battle-tested since 2016 with extensive security audit history
Honest weakness
Default experience feels dated next to Phantom or Rabby unless you install Snaps to enable auto chain switching, advanced transaction simulation and modern UX patterns
Who it's for
EVM-first users wanting the most dApp compatibility. Developers building Web3 integrations who need MetaMask for default testing. Snaps power users wanting to extend wallet capabilities. Users prioritizing battle-tested track record over latest features.

Key metrics

Supported chains All EVM, Bitcoin, Solana, TRON via 2025 expansion
Swap fee 0.875%
Mobile + extension Yes
Open source Yes
Hardware wallet support Ledger, Trezor, Keystone, NGRAVE plus 7 more
Built-in staking ETH via Lido partnership, SOL via Marinade
Notable 2025 launches Native BTC/SOL/TRON support, MetaMask Card expansion
Compare MetaMask
MetaMask vs Phantom →Coinbase Wallet vs MetaMask →Trust Wallet vs MetaMask (via legacy) →
#3

Rabby

Security-first wallet with pre-transaction simulation, auto chain switching, 0% swap fee
Score
8.4/10

Rabby is the wallet DeFi power users actually use day to day. Built by the DeBank team, it ships features that MetaMask hasn't shipped: pre-transaction simulation showing exact balance changes before signing, automatic chain switching based on dApp detection, security risk scoring for every contract interaction, approval management UI surfacing infinite approvals you forgot about. The February 2026 lending protocol integration brought Aave, Spark and Venus directly into the wallet UI. The Mezo network support added in March 2026 confirms Rabby's chain breadth. The 0% swap fee policy beats every other wallet in the category. Tradeoffs: EVM-only with no Bitcoin or Solana support, mobile app only recently matured (extension is the primary surface), smaller user base means some niche dApps may not list Rabby explicitly though it works with any EVM dApp via standard injection. The March 25, 2026 Sonic Labs node sync incident temporarily affected gas estimation but funds were not at risk and service restored within hours.

Key strengths

  • Pre-transaction simulation shows exact balance changes before you sign, plus phishing risk detection
  • Automatic chain switching across 108 EVM chains eliminates manual network friction
  • 0% swap fee policy beats every other major wallet in transparent fee comparisons
  • Direct lending protocol access for Aave, Spark and Venus inside the wallet UI
  • Open-source codebase with active DeBank team development since launch
Honest weakness
EVM-only with zero support for Bitcoin, Solana or other non-EVM chains means Rabby cannot be a sole wallet for cross-ecosystem users
Who it's for
DeFi power users who interact with multiple EVM chains daily. Security-conscious users who want every transaction simulated before signing. Anyone tired of manual MetaMask chain switching. Users avoiding swap fees on high-volume trading.

Key metrics

Supported chains 108 EVM chains (no BTC, SOL, non-EVM)
Swap fee 0% policy on direct swaps
Mobile + extension Both (extension is primary)
Open source Yes
Hardware wallet support Ledger, Trezor, Keystone, OneKey
Built-in staking No native staking
Notable 2026 launches Aave/Spark/Venus integration, Mezo support, mobile app maturity
Compare Rabby
Rabby vs Rainbow →Zerion vs Rabby →
#4

Trust Wallet

Mass market multi-chain wallet with 220M+ downloads and 100+ blockchain support
Score
8.0/10

Trust Wallet wins the mass market by being the wallet your non-crypto-native friend can actually use. The 220 million+ downloads make it the most-installed self-custody wallet globally. The 100+ supported blockchains beat every competitor on raw chain count. The $0 staking, $0 buy/sell and $0 send/receive fee structure is the most generous transparent fee model in the category. Binance ecosystem integration provides a path from CEX trading to self-custody that no other wallet matches at scale. Where Trust Wallet falls short of Phantom or Rabby: swap fees use hidden routing margins that aren't transparently disclosed, advanced DeFi features are weaker than EVM-specialist wallets, transaction simulation is less detailed than Rabby pre-execution checks. The Trust Wallet experience optimizes for breadth and approachability over depth, which is the right call for the audience while limiting power-user appeal.

Key strengths

  • 220M+ downloads make Trust Wallet the most-installed self-custody wallet globally
  • 100+ blockchain support beats every competitor on raw chain count breadth
  • $0 staking, buy, sell, send and receive fees with most generous transparent fee model
  • Binance ecosystem integration provides path from CEX to self-custody at scale
  • Strong mobile experience with onboarding optimized for crypto beginners
Honest weakness
Hidden routing margins on swaps mean advertised low fees don't tell the full story, plus advanced DeFi features lag behind EVM-specialist wallets
Who it's for
Crypto beginners coming from Binance or other CEXes. Multi-chain users prioritizing breadth over depth. Mobile-first users who don't need browser extension features. Anyone wanting the lowest transparent fee profile across staking and transfers.

Key metrics

Supported chains 100+ blockchains natively
Swap fee Variable hidden routing margins
Mobile + extension Yes
Open source Partial
Hardware wallet support Ledger
Built-in staking $0 fees on 25+ assets
User base 220M+ downloads globally
Compare Trust Wallet
Trust Wallet vs MetaMask (via legacy) →Trust Wallet vs Exodus →SafePal vs Trust Wallet →
#5

Coinbase Wallet

Smart Wallet with FIDO2 passkeys, account abstraction, easiest onboarding for beginners
Score
7.6/10

Coinbase Wallet is what self-custody looks like for the next 100 million users. The Smart Wallet introduction replaced seed phrases with FIDO2 passkeys, which means biometric or security-key authentication instead of writing 12 words on paper. Account abstraction via ERC-4337 lets the wallet sponsor gas fees, batch transactions plus recover access via social methods. Base L2 native integration provides the cheapest mainstream EVM transactions in the wallet. The 110 million Coinbase Exchange user funnel makes Coinbase Wallet the easiest path from CEX trading to self-custody at scale. Where it falls short: the 1% swap fee is the highest among major wallets, multi-chain support beyond EVM is limited. The Smart Wallet vendor lock-in means you can't easily export your keys to another wallet. The friction-free experience comes with tradeoffs that power users won't accept.

Key strengths

  • Smart Wallet uses FIDO2 passkeys eliminating seed phrase friction for new users
  • Account abstraction via ERC-4337 enables gas sponsorship and batched transactions
  • Base L2 native integration provides cheapest mainstream EVM transactions inside the wallet
  • 110M Coinbase Exchange user funnel makes self-custody onboarding easier than any competitor
  • Strong mobile UX with clean onboarding optimized for crypto-native beginners
Honest weakness
1% swap fee is highest among major wallets plus Smart Wallet vendor lock-in prevents key export to other wallets
Who it's for
Crypto beginners coming from Coinbase Exchange. Users who want passkey authentication instead of seed phrases. Base L2 users wanting native UX. Anyone prioritizing onboarding simplicity over fee optimization.

Key metrics

Supported chains Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Solana
Swap fee ~1% (DEX spread)
Mobile + extension Yes
Open source Smart Wallet contracts open, app proprietary
Hardware wallet support Limited
Built-in staking ETH via partners
Auth method FIDO2 passkeys (Smart Wallet) plus traditional seed
Compare Coinbase Wallet
Coinbase Wallet vs MetaMask →
#6

Rainbow

Ethereum-native wallet with ENS-first UX, NFT gallery and approachable mobile design
Score
7.2/10

Rainbow built the prettiest crypto wallet on the market by treating Ethereum-native primitives as first-class UX. ENS names instead of 0x addresses everywhere. Built-in NFT gallery that doesn't feel like an afterthought. Token-bound profiles that work like crypto-native social media. The Rainbow Mobile experience won design awards in 2024 and the team has continued shipping refinement updates through 2026. Where Rainbow falls behind: no native non-EVM support means Solana and Bitcoin users need a separate wallet, swap fees match Phantom at 0.85% so no fee advantage, advanced DeFi features are weaker than Rabby or MetaMask for power users, smaller user base than Phantom or Trust Wallet means some dApps don't explicitly test against Rainbow. The wallet succeeds at being the most beautiful Ethereum experience but doesn't try to compete on multi-chain breadth.

Key strengths

  • ENS-first UX treats Ethereum-native primitives as first-class instead of optional addons
  • Built-in NFT gallery feels integrated rather than bolted-on like competing wallets
  • Token-bound profiles work like crypto-native social media for shareable identity
  • Mobile UX won design awards in 2024 with continued refinement through 2026
  • Approachable onboarding with clean visual hierarchy beats most competitors on aesthetics
Honest weakness
No native non-EVM support means Solana, Bitcoin or Cosmos users need separate wallet plus advanced DeFi features lag specialist EVM wallets
Who it's for
Ethereum-first users who appreciate design quality. ENS holders who want their name visible everywhere. NFT collectors wanting integrated gallery experience. Anyone prioritizing aesthetics and onboarding clarity over multi-chain breadth.

Key metrics

Supported chains Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Zora, Avalanche, BSC
Swap fee 0.85%
Mobile + extension Yes
Open source Yes
Hardware wallet support Ledger
Built-in staking ETH via Rocket Pool integration
Notable feature ENS-first UX, NFT gallery, token-bound profiles
Compare Rainbow
Rabby vs Rainbow →Rainbow vs Phantom →
#7

Backpack

Solana-native wallet with xNFT executable token support and integrated exchange access
Score
6.8/10

Backpack is the most ambitious Solana-first wallet attempt of 2026. The xNFT standard turns NFTs into executable applications inside the wallet, enabling experiences like games, social apps and protocols that run inside your wallet UI. Backpack Exchange integration provides perpetuals trading without leaving the wallet, which competes directly with Phantom Cash on the user-experience front. The Mad Lads NFT collection by the Backpack team created a strong Solana-native community early in the wallet's lifecycle. Where Backpack falls short: smaller user base than Phantom or Solflare on Solana, EVM support limited compared to multi-chain wallets, xNFT ecosystem still pre-traction outside the Mad Lads community. The wallet's bet on executable NFTs is interesting product positioning but hasn't broken into mainstream usage. Worth watching if Solana mobile or xNFT standards gain traction in 2026.

Key strengths

  • xNFT standard turns NFTs into executable apps inside the wallet UI
  • Integrated Backpack Exchange access provides perpetuals trading without leaving the wallet
  • Mad Lads NFT collection created strong Solana-native community at launch
  • Solana-first design philosophy beats EVM-first wallets on Solana feature depth
  • Open-source codebase with active development from Coral team
Honest weakness
Smaller user base than Phantom or Solflare on Solana plus xNFT ecosystem traction limited outside Mad Lads community
Who it's for
Solana-native users who want xNFT executable application support. Mad Lads NFT holders. Backpack Exchange traders wanting wallet-integrated perpetuals. Users betting on xNFT standard adoption in 2026.

Key metrics

Supported chains Solana, Ethereum, Polygon
Swap fee Variable
Mobile + extension Yes
Open source Yes
Hardware wallet support Ledger
Built-in staking SOL native
Distinctive feature xNFT executable applications inside wallet UI
Compare Backpack
Backpack vs Phantom →

Side-by-side comparison

WalletChainsSwap feeOpen sourceHardware supportScore
PhantomSOL+EVM+BTC+Sui0.85%PartialLedger9.0
MetaMaskEVM+BTC+SOL+TRON0.875%Yes10+ devices8.6
Rabby108 EVM chains0%YesLedger, Trezor, Keystone8.4
Trust Wallet100+ chainsHidden marginPartialLedger8.0
Coinbase WalletEVM + SOL~1%Smart Wallet contractsLimited7.6
RainbowEVM only0.85%YesLedger7.2
BackpackSOL + EVMVariableYesLedger6.8

Final verdict

The crypto wallet category in 2026 has stratified more clearly than at any previous point. Phantom won by treating multi-chain as a product priority and shipping faster than every competitor. The February 2026 MCP Server release plus the March 2026 CFTC no-action letter plus Phantom Cash debit card plus the Blowfish acquisition show product velocity that MetaMask and Coinbase Wallet cannot match. The 0.85% swap fee undercuts most full-featured wallets while remaining competitive with Rainbow.

MetaMask still owns the EVM dApp footprint and the Snaps extension ecosystem makes it the most extensible wallet for power users who configure their setup. The 2025 native Bitcoin, Solana and TRON additions closed the multi-chain gap that competitors had been exploiting. But MetaMask's default experience now feels dated next to Phantom or Rabby unless you install Snaps to enable modern features. The product velocity has slowed even as installed base remains the largest in the category.

Rabby has become the security-first choice for DeFi power users in a way MetaMask hasn't. Pre-transaction simulation, automatic chain switching across 108 EVM chains, security risk scoring plus 0% swap fees beat every competitor on power-user features. The EVM-only limitation prevents Rabby from being a sole wallet for cross-ecosystem users yet for someone who's primarily on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base or Polygon, Rabby is now the better daily driver than MetaMask.

Trust Wallet wins the mass market because of the 220 million download installed base plus 100+ chain coverage plus $0 staking fees. The hidden swap routing margins are real. The breadth-first product positioning is the right call for non-power-users though. Coinbase Wallet's Smart Wallet bet on FIDO2 passkeys is the right direction for the next 100 million crypto users even if vendor lock-in concerns prevent power users from adopting it.

Rainbow stays the prettiest Ethereum-native wallet with ENS-first UX that competitors don't replicate. Backpack's xNFT bet remains interesting but hasn't broken mainstream traction outside the Mad Lads community. The 2026 wallet category is mature enough that picking is more about fit than ranking.

If you want a single wallet for 2026, pick Phantom for multi-chain or Rabby if you're EVM-only and value security simulation. If you already use MetaMask, switching costs are real though Rabby is MetaMask-compatible meaning you can import and run both side by side. The wallet you actually open every day is more important than the wallet that scored highest in any ranking.

FAQ

What's the best crypto wallet in 2026?
Phantom is the best overall crypto wallet for 2026 because it ships multi-chain support across Solana, Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Bitcoin and Sui with the cleanest UX in the category. The February 2026 Phantom MCP Server release plus the March 2026 CFTC no-action letter signal product velocity that no competitor matches. MetaMask is still the right choice if you want maximum dApp compatibility on EVM chains. Rabby wins for DeFi power users who prioritize transaction simulation and 0% swap fees. The right answer depends on your primary chains and whether you optimize for breadth (Phantom or Trust Wallet), EVM depth (MetaMask or Rabby) or onboarding simplicity (Coinbase Wallet).
Is Phantom better than MetaMask?
For multi-chain users, Phantom is better than MetaMask in 2026. Phantom's UX across Solana, Ethereum, Bitcoin and Sui beats MetaMask's recently-added non-EVM support. For EVM-only users wanting maximum dApp compatibility plus Snaps extensibility, MetaMask remains the right call. Phantom ships faster (MCP server, Phantom Cash, Blowfish acquisition) while MetaMask's pace has slowed. The 0.85% Phantom swap fee undercuts MetaMask 0.875%. Both are non-custodial and battle-tested. Most users won't go wrong with either. Phantom is gaining momentum while MetaMask coasts on installed base.
Is Rabby Wallet safe to use?
Yes, Rabby Wallet is safe to use and arguably more security-focused than MetaMask for DeFi users. Rabby ships pre-transaction simulation showing exact balance changes before you sign, automatic phishing detection, security risk scoring for contract interactions plus approval management surfacing infinite approvals you forgot about. The wallet is open-source and developed by the DeBank team with active maintenance. The March 25, 2026 Sonic Labs node sync incident temporarily affected gas estimation but funds were not at risk and service was restored within hours. Rabby's main limitation is EVM-only support with no Bitcoin or Solana coverage.
Which wallet has the lowest swap fees in 2026?
Rabby has the lowest swap fees at 0% for direct swaps. Among full-featured wallets with broader chain support, Trust Wallet advertises 0% but uses hidden routing margins that aren't transparently disclosed. With transparent fees: Phantom and Rainbow both charge 0.85%, MetaMask charges 0.875%, Coinbase Wallet charges roughly 1%. On $10,000 in annual swap volume, the difference between 0% and 1% is $100. For high-volume traders, Rabby is the right call. For everyday users who value brand trust and product velocity, the 0.85% Phantom fee is competitive.
Should I use a hardware wallet with my software wallet?
Yes, pairing a hardware wallet with a software wallet is the recommended security setup for amounts you cannot afford to lose. The hardware wallet stores private keys offline preventing remote extraction, while the software wallet provides daily transaction convenience and dApp connectivity. MetaMask supports 10+ hardware devices including Ledger, Trezor, Keystone and NGRAVE. Phantom supports Ledger. Rabby supports Ledger, Trezor, Keystone and OneKey. The hardware wallet signs transactions while the software wallet provides UX. You get cold storage security with hot wallet convenience.
Is Coinbase Wallet better than MetaMask for beginners?
Yes, Coinbase Wallet is the better choice for crypto beginners than MetaMask. The Smart Wallet uses FIDO2 passkeys instead of seed phrases meaning you authenticate with biometrics or a security key without writing 12 words on paper. Account abstraction via ERC-4337 enables gas sponsorship and batched transactions reducing user-friction in DeFi. The 110 million Coinbase Exchange user funnel provides the easiest CEX-to-self-custody onboarding path. The tradeoffs are 1% swap fees (highest among major wallets) and Smart Wallet vendor lock-in preventing key export. For beginners willing to accept those tradeoffs, Coinbase Wallet beats MetaMask on onboarding simplicity.
Can I use multiple crypto wallets at the same time?
Yes, using multiple crypto wallets is a common security and workflow pattern. Many users run MetaMask or Rabby for EVM DeFi plus Phantom for Solana plus a hardware wallet (Ledger or Trezor) for long-term storage. Rabby is fully MetaMask-compatible meaning you can import the same seed phrase into both and use them side by side for different workflows. Coinbase Smart Wallet is harder to integrate with this pattern due to vendor lock-in on key export. The downside of multiple wallets is keeping track of which holds what plus increased phishing surface area. Most power users settle on 2-3 wallets covering distinct use cases.
What's the difference between hot wallets and cold wallets?
Hot wallets are software wallets that stay connected to the internet via browser extensions, mobile apps or desktop applications. Cold wallets are hardware devices that store private keys offline like Ledger, Trezor, Coldcard or NGRAVE. Hot wallets like Phantom, MetaMask and Rabby provide daily transaction convenience plus dApp connectivity but face higher remote attack surface from malware and phishing. Cold wallets sacrifice convenience for security since you must physically connect the device and confirm transactions on-device. The recommended setup is hot wallet for daily activity plus cold wallet for amounts you cannot afford to lose, with the hot wallet integrated to the cold wallet for transaction signing.

Head-to-head comparisons

Deeper dives on specific matchups from this ranking.

Backpack vs PhantomCoinbase Wallet vs MetamaskMetamask vs PhantomPhantom vs SolflareRabby vs RainbowRainbow vs PhantomSafepal vs Trust WalletTrust Wallet vs ExodusTrust Wallet vs MetamaskZerion vs Rabby

Data sources

Run a free Crawlux audit

See how your project ranks against the leaders in AI search and crypto SEO. No credit card. Free tier on one domain.

Run free audit →