What Crawlux is, and what it is not.

What Crawlux audits are and are not

Two columns. The first lists what audits actually do. The second lists what they explicitly do not do. The distinction matters because misunderstanding it leads to expectation mismatches.

Crawlux audits are not professional advice

Audit reports contain technical SEO measurements and recommendations. They are not a substitute for qualified professional advice in legal, financial, regulatory or compliance domains.

No guaranteed outcomes

Following audit recommendations may improve search rankings, AI citation rates and traffic. It is not guaranteed to do so. SEO and AEO outcomes depend on factors outside any single tool's control.

Factors outside our control

Audit recommendations work in proportion to factors we cannot affect. The 90-day score predictions in audit reports assume typical conditions and reasonable execution.

• Search engine algorithm updates and changes in ranking factor weighting
• AI model retraining cycles, citation pattern changes and new model releases
• Competitor activity, including competitor SEO and content investments
• Market conditions, search demand fluctuations and seasonal patterns
• Implementation quality of recommended fixes by your engineering team
• Time required for search engines and AI engines to recrawl and re-index
• Domain history including past penalties or trust signal issues

Third-party content disclaimer

Crawlux audits incorporate data from third-party providers. The accuracy, completeness and availability of that data depends on those providers, not on us.

External links disclaimer

Crawlux content links to external resources, partner sites, methodology references and third-party documentation. We do not control those external resources and are not responsible for their content, accuracy or availability.

Methodology limitations

The Crawlux methodology is documented openly and refined quarterly. It has known scope limitations that buyers should understand before relying on audit findings for critical decisions.

• The methodology is calibrated against crypto and Web3 sites. Non-crypto sites can be audited but receive findings tuned to crypto context.
• AEO testing covers ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude. Other AI engines are not currently tested. Citation patterns may differ on untested engines.
• Schema validation covers a defined set of schema types. Newer or less common schema types may not have full validator coverage.
• On-chain signals depend on supported chains. Niche chains may have limited or no on-chain signal coverage.
• Authority source weighting is calibrated against the published Tier 1 to Tier 3 source list. Changes to source authority happen between methodology versions.
• The 90-day action plan score predictions assume reasonable implementation quality. Bad implementations may underperform predictions significantly.

Contact

Questions about the disclaimer scope, clarification on what audits include or do not include, or general policy questions go to the legal team.

For audit-specific questions or methodology challenges, see the methodology page. For service terms, see the terms of service. For data handling, see the privacy policy.